Introduce RetryInterruptedException to address off-by-one error

Prior to this commit, a RetryException thrown for an
InterruptedException returned the wrong value from getRetryCount().
Specifically, the count was one more than it should have been, since the
suppressed exception list contains the initial exception as well as all
retry attempt exceptions.

To address that, this commit introduces an internal
RetryInterruptedException which accounts for this off-by-one error.

Closes gh-35434
This commit is contained in:
Sam Brannen
2025-09-08 14:22:52 +02:00
parent b2cdfbadf1
commit 1786eb2901
2 changed files with 18 additions and 4 deletions
@@ -238,9 +238,7 @@ class RetryTemplateTests {
.withMessageMatching("Unable to back off for retryable operation '.+?'")
.withCause(interruptedException)
.satisfies(throwable -> assertThat(throwable.getSuppressed()).containsExactly(exception))
// TODO Fix retry count for InterruptedException scenario.
// Retry count should actually be 0.
.satisfies(throwable -> assertThat(throwable.getRetryCount()).isEqualTo(1))
.satisfies(throwable -> assertThat(throwable.getRetryCount()).isZero())
.satisfies(throwable -> inOrder.verify(retryListener).onRetryPolicyInterruption(retryPolicy, retryable, throwable));
verifyNoMoreInteractions(retryListener);