After experimenting with our newly introduced core retry support
(RetryPolicy, RetryTemplate, etc.) and @Retryable support, it
became apparent that there are overlapping concerns between the current
RetryPolicy and BackOff contracts.
- RetryPolicy and BackOff both have stateful executions: RetryExecution
and BackOffExecution. However, only one stateful execution is
necessary.
- FixedBackOff and ExponentialBackOff already incorporate "retry" logic
in terms of max attempts, max elapsed time, etc. Thus, there is no
need to duplicate such behavior in a RetryPolicy and its
RetryExecution.
- RetryTemplate currently accepts both a RetryPolicy and a BackOff in
order to instrument the retry algorithm. However, users would
probably rather focus on configuring all "retry" logic via a single
mechanism.
In light of the above, this commit directly incorporates BackOff
in RetryPolicy as follows.
- Remove the RetryExecution interface and move its shouldRetry() method
to RetryPolicy, replacing the current RetryExecution start() method.
- Introduce a default getBackOff() method in the RetryPolicy interface.
- Introduce RetryPolicy.withDefaults() factory method.
- Completely overhaul the RetryPolicy.Builder to provide support for
configuring a BackOff strategy.
- Remove BackOff configuration from RetryTemplate.
- Revise the method signatures of callbacks in RetryListener.
The collective result of these changes can be witnessed in the
reworked implementation of AbstractRetryInterceptor.
RetryPolicy retryPolicy = RetryPolicy.builder()
.includes(spec.includes())
.excludes(spec.excludes())
.predicate(spec.predicate().forMethod(method))
.maxAttempts(spec.maxAttempts())
.delay(Duration.ofMillis(spec.delay()))
.maxDelay(Duration.ofMillis(spec.maxDelay()))
.jitter(Duration.ofMillis(spec.jitter()))
.multiplier(spec.multiplier())
.build();
RetryTemplate retryTemplate = new RetryTemplate(retryPolicy);
See gh-34716
See gh-34529
See gh-35058
Closes gh-35110
Based on RetryTemplate with ExponentialBackOff.
Includes optional jitter support in ExponentialBackOff.
Supports reactive methods through Reactor's RetryBackoffSpec.
Closes gh-34529
This commit configures a new CheckStyle rule that fails for empty
"catch" blocks, unless the exception is named "ignored" or "expected".
This also fixes the remaining instances missed by the previous commit.
Closes gh-35047
The Spring codebase sometimes ignores exceptions in catch blocks on
purpose. This is often called out by an inline comment.
We should make this more obvious by renaming the exception argument in
the catch block to declare whether the exception is "ignored" or
"expected".
See gh-35047
Signed-off-by: Vincent Potucek <vpotucek@me.com>
[brian.clozel@broadcom.com: rework commit message]
Signed-off-by: Brian Clozel <brian.clozel@broadcom.com>
This commit updates the whole Spring Framework codebase to use JSpecify
annotations instead of Spring null-safety annotations with JSR 305
semantics.
JSpecify provides signficant enhancements such as properly defined
specifications, a canonical dependency with no split-package issue,
better tooling, better Kotlin integration and the capability to specify
generic type, array and varargs element null-safety. Generic type
null-safety is not defined by this commit yet and will be specified
later.
A key difference is that Spring null-safety annotations, following
JSR 305 semantics, apply to fields, parameters and return values,
while JSpecify annotations apply to type usages. That's why this
commit moves nullability annotations closer to the type for fields
and return values.
See gh-28797
Prior to this commit, the equals() implementation in AdvisedSupport's
MethodCacheKey only considered methods to be equal based on an identity
comparison (`==`), which led to duplicate entries in the method cache
for the same logical method.
This is caused by the fact that AdvisedSupport's
getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice() method is invoked at
various stages with different Method instances for the same method:
1) when creating the proxy
2) when invoking the method via the proxy
The reason the Method instances are different is due to the following.
- Methods such as Class#getDeclaredMethods() and
Class#getDeclaredMethod() always returns "child copies" of the
underlying Method instances -- which means that `equals()` should be
used instead of (or in addition to) `==` whenever the compared Method
instances can come from different sources.
With this commit, the equals() implementation in MethodCacheKey now
considers methods equal based on identity or logical equality, giving
preference to the quicker identity check.
See gh-32586
Closes gh-33915
This commit adapts AOT support in various modules after the RuntimeHints
and related deprecation changes.
`MemberCategory.INTROSPECT_*` hints are now removed and
`MemberCategory.*_FIELDS` are replaced with
`MemberCategory.INVOKE*_FIELDS` when invocation is needed.
Usage of `RuntimeHintsAgent` are also deprecated.
Closes gh-33847